(1)SEE ‘EXPOSE’ Topic #21. DAW ON “IT COULDN’T BE DONE”. (Hostile witness) referring to his statement to KENNER that Al Petty could NOT do what he DID do in enhancing the lives of others).
(2)COMMENT: While J. R. Smith was crossing DAW, HANNAH took the initiative to prompt FALSE INFORMATION from DAW. HANNAH’S function was NOT to assist the prosecution in producing FALSE & MISLEADING information, damaging to Al Petty, from the witness. Here’s an EXAMPLE!
HANNAH: (P176;L22-25) “ARE WE TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE WHO HAS RECRUITED SOMEBODY WHO’S RECRUITED SOMEBODY ELSE WHO THEY HAD RECRUITED OTHER PEOPLE AND ALL THESE PEOPLE HAVE RECRUITED SOME RESIDUAL OR, MONEY FLOWS BACK TO THE ORIGINAL PERSON?
COMMENT: Hannah was describing Multi-Level Marketing, NOT TeleCom2000! Whereas Al Petty – TeleCom2000 started as MLM, the most important thing Al Petty accomplished was to expose MLM for the Rip–Off it is, AND to develop TeleCom2000 technologically until the SUCCESS OF EVERY BUSINESS SOLD WAS GUARANTEED!
Next, DAW attempts to explain the change from the MLM that HANNAH was mistakenly describing, but HANNAH overpowers & interrupts DAW. (A Hostile witness, nevertheless!)DAW: (P177; L1-2) “YES, EITHER THEY RECRUITED OR THEY’VE HIRED THE RECRUITING DONE. THAT WAS THE- - - - - (INTERRUPTED) (COMMENT) was about to say that the Purchase included a contract HIRING TeleCom2000 to do the Marketing – THE Key to the 90% Cost Cutting! HANNAH NEVER DID GET IT! THIS WAS NOT MLM OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT HAD EVER BEEN ACCOMPLISED BY ANYONE! Before DAW could explain:
HANNAH: (P177; L3-4) “AND YOU CALL THESE INDIVIDUALS BUSINESSES?”
COMMENT: HANNAH made this false & inflammatory statement as the first of MANY such FALSE & PREJUDICIAL statements by him throughout the trial! Once again DAW attempts to explain one of Al Petty’s earlier concepts of “5 BUSINESSES UNDER ONE ROOF”. It went straight over HANNAH’S HEAD!
DAW: (P177; L5-7) “YES. IN HIS MARKETING LITERATURE HE CALLED IT “SO MANY BUSINESSES UNDER ONE ROOF”. I DON’T REMEMBER HOW MANY HE SAID, BUT
COMMENT: - - (interrupted by the “unjust Judge” again!)
HANNAH: (P177; L8-10) “ARE WE JUST TALKING ABOUT A PERSON WHO’S RECRUITED OTHER PEOPLE WHO PERHAPS HAS BEEN RECRUITED HIMSELF, CORRECT?”
DAW: (P177; L11) “THAT IS CORRECT.”
COMMENT: Yes, when talking about MLM, that’s correct! However this trial was NOT about Al Petty running an MLM, (or a PONZI!). This trial was about “Al Petty & his creation", TeleCom2000, which was not MLM or ANYTHING ELSE in existence when he created it.
HANNAH: (P177; L12) “ALL RIGHT”
COMMENT: Then DAW tries again in vain to explain that this concept was MLM, regarding Al Petty’s concept at the time, called “5 Businesses UNDER ONE ROOF”, NOT THE TELECOM2000 of 2002! This MLM was in the LATTER days of 1999 BEFORE Al Petty created TeleCom2000.
DAW: (P177; L13) “EACH ‘NODE’ IN THE BUSINESS IS IT’S OWN BUSINESS”.
COMMENT: AL PETTY’S CONCEPT OF “FIVE BUSINESSES UNDER ONE ROOF” was similar to a “MALL” Concept.
QUESTION: WAS HANNAH BORDERING ON “JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT” BY ASSUMING THE ROLE OF THE PROSECUTION IN CONFUSING THE JURY WITH THESE IRRELEVANT & INFLAMMATORY STATEMENTS? CERTAINLY, HIM, in the eyes of Jurors, BEING THE “SUPPOSEDLY” “IMPARTIAL JUDGE”, HIS FALSE STATEMENTS HAD TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME OF THE JURY’S DECISION!
